to leave a comment.

▲ Bitcoin (BTC), Quantum Computer/AI Generated Image
The rapid advancement of quantum computer technology directly threatens Bitcoin's security system, foreshadowing a structural conflict across the entire virtual asset market. It is predicted that if existing cryptographic technology is rendered powerless, a large-scale hardfork conflict over changing the signature system will be inevitable.
Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano, stated in an interview with Paul Barron Network on April 28 (local time) that the point at which quantum computers will collapse current cryptographic systems is arriving sooner than expected. He explained that Ethereum developers have adjusted the quantum threat timeline to before 2032, and the U.S. Department of Defense and major corporations are also intensively reviewing risks before 2033. While post-quantum cryptography technology is being proposed as an alternative, its practical application has limitations due to increased signature size and reduced processing speed.
Bitcoin, in particular, is expected to face severe internal conflict over the issue of handling assets in addresses that have not been used for a long time. Hoskinson pointed out that if proposals to freeze or move dormant assets, including Satoshi Nakamoto's early holdings, are discussed, extreme conflicts could arise between institutional investors and existing Bitcoin proponents. A hardfork that intervenes with assets without legal authority could shake the foundation of the network, but it is emerging as an unavoidable choice to address security threats.
Meanwhile, in traditional finance, the technological competition for real-world asset tokenization and privacy protection is intensifying. Midnight, part of the Cardano ecosystem, has proposed a structure that enables regulatory compliance without exposing personal information through zero-knowledge proof-based self-sovereign identity technology. The possibility of saving hundreds of billions of dollars annually in financial compliance costs through on-chain automated systems, as seen in collaborations like with Monument Bank, is also being raised.
Market leadership is also subject to change. Hoskinson analyzed that the center of virtual asset economic activity will shift from humans to AI agents in the future. In such an environment, open networks are more likely to gain a competitive edge than closed systems. At the same time, concerns were raised that if the U.S. cryptocurrency market structure bill is designed to focus on existing assets, it could limit growth opportunities for new projects.
The virtual asset industry is facing a new turning point amidst the dual pressures of regulation and technology. Choices surrounding quantum threat response and network structure reorganization are emerging as key variables determining the future direction of the market.
*Disclaimer: This article is for investment reference only, and we are not responsible for any investment losses based on it. The content should be interpreted for informational purposes only.*
Newsletter
Get key news delivered to your email every morning
to leave a comment.