Ethereum, Worst Identity Crisis Explodes...ETH/BTC Ratio Plummets to All-Time Low

▲ Ethereum (ETH), cryptocurrency decline/AI generated image

An analysis suggests that Ethereum (ETH) is facing a strategic crisis due to a confluence of leadership departures, sluggish price performance, and debates over the role of the Ethereum Foundation. GSR Research diagnosed that Ethereum's problems are not a temporary dip in morale but are escalating into an identity crisis surrounding the network's direction and growth strategy.

Bitcoinist reported on May 26 (local time) that Carlos Guzman of GSR Research addressed internal debates within Ethereum in a report titled "Ethereum's Identity Crisis." Guzman stated that at least nine senior contributors have left the Ethereum Foundation since the beginning of 2026, with five departing in May alone. The list includes Protocol Cluster Leads Tim Beiko and Barnabé Monnot, veteran researchers Carl Beekhuizen and Julian Ma, and former co-executive director Tomasz Stańczak.

Some departures followed the introduction of internal guidelines centered on CROPS, which stands for Censorship Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. While the framework aimed to clarify the Foundation's priorities, Guzman explained that some in the community interpreted this direction as a signal to de-prioritize growth and adoption. In a situation where Ethereum is under pressure from faster-moving competing networks, this debate has escalated into a conflict over the Foundation's role.

The personnel departures have fueled a debate over whether the Ethereum Foundation should remain a narrow research and protocol institution or take a more active role in defending Ethereum's market position. Dankrad Feist, formerly of the Ethereum Foundation, publicly argued for the need for a new organization with over $1 billion in economic alignment with Ethereum. David Hoffman, co-host of Bankless, stated that he sold all his Ethereum holdings due to dissatisfaction with leadership not focusing enough on growth.

The market environment also intensified the internal debates. Guzman pointed out that Ethereum had fallen by about 30% year-to-date, and the ETH/BTC ratio dropped to 0.027 in May, marking its lowest level since mid-2025. Network revenue also weakened. Ethereum was assessed to be losing market share to chains like Solana (SOL), Tron (TRX), and Hyperliquid (HYPE). However, Guzman added that it is difficult to judge the network's health solely by its revenue, as fee reductions are part of a user acquisition strategy.

Vitalik Buterin posted a lengthy message on X (formerly Twitter), emphasizing a redefinition of the Foundation's role rather than an expansion. He described the Ethereum Foundation as a "smaller boat," stating that it should reduce ETH sales and focus on CROPS. Buterin explained that the Foundation should be viewed not as the center of Ethereum but as "one node with a defined purpose."

Buterin's technical vision was summarized along three axes. First is provably flawless software through AI-assisted formal verification. Second is usable chain consensus, combining traditional BFT-style safety in asynchronous network conditions with Bitcoin-style safety even with up to 49% attacker stake in synchronous conditions. Third is minimized intermediation, reducing reliance on centralized relayers and third-party infrastructure in transaction inclusion and privacy through proposals like FOCIL and EIP-8141.

Guzman viewed Ethereum's core bet as still being on credibly neutral decentralization. He pointed out that viewing blockspace as a mere commodity misses a crucial point. Users have historically paid higher costs to transact on chains that offer better assets, applications, liquidity, and network effects. However, he noted that while credibly neutral decentralization might attract builders and institutions, users still need cheap transactions, fast execution, privacy, and a functional user experience. Ethereum is being tested on whether the Foundation's narrow focus can preserve the network's core differentiation while entrusting growth drivers to the ecosystem.

*Disclaimer: This article is for investment reference only, and we are not responsible for any investment losses based on it. The content should be interpreted for informational purposes only.*